What we call "number" is the base type of the interval
class. The interval library expect a lot of properties from this base type
in order to respect the inclusion property. All these properties are
already detailed in the other sections of this documentation; but we will
try to summarize them here.
The numbers need to be supplied with an ordering. This ordering
expresses itself by the operators < <= => > == !=
.
It must be a total order (reflexivity, antisymmetry, transitivity, and each
pair of numbers is ordered). So complex<T>
will not be a
good candidate for the base type; if you need the inclusion property of
interval property, you should use complex< interval<T>
>
in place of interval< complex<T> >
(but unfortunately, complex
only provides specialization).
Please note that invalid numbers are not concerned by the order; it can
even be conceptually better if a comparison with these invalid numbers is
always false
(except for !=
). If your checking
policy uses interval_lib::checking_base
and your base type
contains invalid numbers, then this property is needed:
nan!=nan
(here nan
is an invalid number). If this
property is not present, then you should not use checking_base
directly.
Interval arithmetic involves a lot of comparison to zero. By default,
they are done by comparing the numbers to
static_cast<T>(0)
. However, if the format of the numbers
allows some faster comparisons when dealing with zero, the template
functions in the interval_lib::user
namespace can be
specialized:
namespace user { template<class T> inline bool is_zero(T const &v) { return v == static_cast<T>(0); } template<class T> inline bool is_neg (T const &v) { return v < static_cast<T>(0); } template<class T> inline bool is_pos (T const &v) { return v > static_cast<T>(0); } }
Another remark about the checking policy. It normally is powerful enough
to handle the exceptional behavior that the basic type could induce; in
particular infinite and invalid numbers (thanks to the four functions
pos_inf
, neg_inf
, nan
and
is_nan
). However, if you use
interval_lib::checking_base
(and the default checking policy
uses it), your base type should have a correctly specialized
std::numeric_limits<T>
. In particular, the values
has_infinity
and has_quiet_NaN
, and the functions
infinity
and quiet_NaN
should be accordingly
defined.
So, to summarize, if you do not rely on the default policy and do not
use interval_lib::checking_base
, it is not necessary to have a
specialization of the numeric limits for your base type.
Ensuring the numbers are correctly ordered is not enough. The basic operators should also respect some properties depending on the order. Here they are:
The previous properties are also used (and enough) for abs
,
square
and pow
. For all the transcendental
functions (including sqrt
), other properties are needed. These
functions should have the same properties than the corresponding real
functions. For example, the expected properties for cos
are:
cos
is defined for all the valid numbers;cos
(2π-x) is equal to
cos
(x);cos
is a decreasing function on [0,2π].If you work with a base type and no inexact result is ever computed, you can skip the rest of this paragraph. You can also skip it if you are not interested in the inclusion property (if approximate results are enough). If you are still reading, it is probably because you want to know the basic properties the rounding policy should validate.
Whichever operation or function you consider, the following property
should be respected: f_down(x,y) <= f(x,y) <= f_up(x,y)
.
Here, f
denotes the infinitely precise function computed and
f_down
and f_up
are functions which return
possibly inexact values but of the correct type (the base type). If
possible, they should try to return the nearest representable value, but it
is not always easy.
In order for the trigonometric functions to correctly work, the library need to know the value of the π constant (and also π/2 and 2π). Since these constants may not be representable in the base type, the library does not have to know the exact value: a lower bound and an upper bound are enough. If these values are not provided by the user, the default values will be used: they are integer values (so π is bounded by 3 and 4).
As explained at the beginning, the comparison operators should be defined for the base type. The rounding policy defines a lot of functions used by the interval library. So the arithmetic operators do not need to be defined for the base type (unless required by one of the predefined classes). However, there is an exception: the unary minus need to be defined. Moreover, this operator should only provide exact results; it is the reason why the rounding policy does not provide some negation functions.
The conversion from int
to the base type needs to be
defined (only a few values need to be available: -1, 0, 1, 2). The
conversion the other way around is provided by the rounding policy
(int_down
and int_up
members); and no other
conversion is strictly needed. However, it may be valuable to provide as
much conversions as possible in the rounding policy (conv_down
and conv_up
members) in order to benefit from interval
conversions.
Revised 2006-12-24
Copyright © 2002 Guillaume Melquiond, Sylvain Pion, Hervé
Brönnimann, Polytechnic University
Copyright © 2004 Guillaume Melquiond
Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)